A yet to be piloted lesson plan

Before, throughout and after the most recent #eltchat, many burning questions emerged in my mind. The topic of the chat was How to teach writing. Based on my experience, teaching writing is not exactly popular with most EFL teachers. I don’t think that it’s primarily because teachers find it off-putting to correct written assignments; I suspect the reason may be that most teachers really don’t know how to teach writing effectively. Personally, I have no problem with speaking, listening or reading. I think I can prepare a meaningful lesson focusing on any of the three skills. When it comes down to writing though, I don’t feel so confident. Is it because in real life,  I do more speaking, listening and reading and so I find it easier and more natural to teach these skills in L2? 
I wouldn’t say I’m a totally inexperienced writer, though; I’ve been writing this blog for some time now, and I think I have some idea of how difficult it is to produce a cohesive and coherent piece of text. I have a huge advantage, however. I can write whatever I want and whenever I wish. The problem is that at school, students are permanently asked to write about topics prescribed by the teachers or the curricula. Write an opinion essay about technology and how it can affect people’s lives, write a report about an accident you’ve recently had, etc. Sometimes we let our students choose the topic, but I dare say that it doesn’t happen very often. And they definitely have to write when the teacher tells them.
Although I too struggle with teaching writing, I think I’ve done a couple of simple activities which proved quite effective, especially when done repeatedly and frequently. For example, I ask Ss to describe and compare random pictures in pairs and later on, when they’ve had plenty of time to prepare, I get them to do the same in writing. Over time, I’ve seen some great improvements in my students’ basic written production. My students have improved their grammar tremendously (verb agreement, plural, the present continuous, prepositions, there is/are, articles, stative verbs), vocabulary (clothes, colours, verbs for actions, adverbs of place, linking devices), but they’ve also polished their style (for example, they know it’s best to start with the general and continue towards the more specific). By asking Ss to write their descriptions down, I encourage them to recycle vocabulary and focus on the language they use in speaking naturally and fluently, but in which they often tend to make mistakes. This activity is something between controlled practice and free practice; Ss are free to write about anything they like but obviously, they’re restricted by the content of the prompts – the images.
To be completely honest, I don’t think L2 learners should be given too much freedom in writing up to a certain level of proficiency, say intermediate. It’s great when Ss can express their ideas and get their message across. The trouble is that they are fond of using their self-invented idioms and collocations, usually directly translated from L1, and when these fossilize, it’s difficult to get rid of them. That’s why I think learners should practise using ready-made chunks and fixed phrases, rather than let their fantasy unwind too much at the early stages of learning the language. I think it’s best the teach Ss paraphrase and summarize (or, alternatively, elaborate) first, and only later let them create their own, unique pieces of writing. 
There’s one thing I’ve recently got really excited about; it’s the News In Levels website. I’ve been peeking in there for some time now but I’ve never actually tried out any of the audios in class, even though I believe it’s a fabulous resource. While reading Ceri Jones’s post Writing to Learn, where she mentions the concept of dictogloss, I couldn’t help visiting the website again and immediately an idea occurred to me. Obviously, the three-level audios are great for practising listening and they are a great source of useful vocabulary, but I believe they’re also highly suitable for teaching writing. This is what I’m planning to do:

A) Gradual elaboration: 1) Ask Ss to listen to the easiest (simplified) version of the authentic news item, i.e. Level 1. This is very short so I’ll use it as a dictation. 2) Play the more difficult version, including more details and more advanced vocabulary, which may be pre-taught if necessary. 3) Ask Ss to re-write the first version, i.e. they elaborate on it from memory, using more detail and more advanced vocabulary. 4) Play the Level 3 version – the original one – just the video, no sound. Allow Ss to make any changes again. 5) Play the video with the sound on. Let Ss add more information to their texts. 6) Ask Ss to write up and submit the final draft. 
B) The backward alternative of the activity; summarizing and paraphrasing: 1) Show the original video, sound off. Ss guess what happened. 2) Show the video again, this time with sound on. Ss try to get a grasp of the general meaning of the news item. 3) Play level 2 and finally level 1 (just audio, no video available). Thus I’ll make sure that even the weakest students know what the news item is about. 4) Ask Ss to write a summary of the news item. I hope that the overlap of visual and verbal memory with their previous knowledge will help Ss to produce the text, but they will probably produce different texts, based on their level of proficiency and writing skills. The weakest students will come up with some basic vocabulary and grammar, while more advanced learners, having caught more advanced structures, will write up a more elaborate summary. This may be perfect for mixed-ability classes. Subsequently, I’ll definitely include some vocabulary practice, because I believe it’s primarily extensive vocabulary that makes good writers. 
I’m going to try this out sometime next week. I think I’ll write a postscript, maybe a brand new post, to let you know how it worked. I’m not yet aware of potential drawbacks and dangers but unless technology fails, I believe everything should work well. I’m convinced this type of activity will be beneficial for many reasons: the videos are interesting, authentic and relatively up-to-date. They are short enough to keep Ss’ attention. The task to write the text is manageable. Ss will learn lots of useful, high-frequency vocabulary. Ss will practise listening, as well as writing, namely spelling (during the dictation), word order (when summarizing and elaborating). I hope the videos will incite interesting discussion. And students can even write an opinion essay in the end! 🙂

About Hana Tichá

I'm an EFL teacher based in the Czech Republic. I've been teaching English to learners of all ages for more than 20 years. I love metaphors and inspiring discussions concerning teaching, learning and linguistics.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to A yet to be piloted lesson plan

  1. eflnotes says:

    hi Hana

    the eltchat on writing seemed very interesting will try to check transcript/summary when i can

    i have head of news in levels but not really used any of it so thanks for this idea, which reminded me that collaborative writing is worth a shot with students although i did not focus on it when i did this sometime ago (http://eflnotes.wordpress.com/2013/01/23/the-thermodynamics-of-glittens-mini-narrow-reading-and-collaborative-writing/) it now strikes me that peer editing is a major benefit of this way of writing and so can help to cut down on feedback/marking burden on teachers!

    if you are interested in academic writing there is a nice tool called AntMover (http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.html) which can help in analyzing the writing moves in research type articles, have only recently found out about this so can't share any experiences but will do should it prove to be effective



  2. Hana Tichá says:

    Thanks for reading and for your tips, Mura. I’m not sure yet what to do with Antmover but I've just read your post and I'm thinking of including some kind of collaborative activity when doing the News in Levels writing task. What comes to mind is some kind of split activity – one group watches the video with sound off and the other group listening to the audio. Alternatively, one group can watch the original news item, while the other group listens to the simplified version. Ss can then write summaries of what they heard/saw, compare them and finally combine them to write the final draft together. The sky’s the limit.


  3. Some interesting ideas here Hana. I look forward to reading how it turns out.


  4. Hana Tichá says:

    Thanks for reading and sharing, David. I tried the activity out back on Monday and it went really well. I think it's because I chose the right topic for the right class. This class generally likes talking about technology and I chose a news item about a spacecraft that had been sent to take pictures of Mars. I slightly changed the activity but we did the dictation and we went through all the levels as described in the post. A few days later, one of the students (a 15-year-old girl) told me that she had really liked the activity because it had helped her remember lots of new vocabulary items. She appreciated what we had done and admitted she was aware of her biggest problem – general lack of vocabulary.
    Next time I’m going to try out a split activity Mura suggests above – one group watching the video with sound off and the other one only reading the text. They’ll share information in pairs and then I’ll play the video with sound on to the whole class. Again, we’ll focus on vocabulary.
    When observing classes I’ve noticed that next to no time is devoted to vocabulary, namely collocation and recycling language in general. Teachers think it’s sufficient to draw attention to brand new words but they neglect partially acquired items. I think this is a big mistake.
    Anyway, thanks for stopping by. I really appreciate your comments.


  5. Thank you for sharing this website and activities, Hana!


  6. Hana Tichá says:

    Thanks for reading, Anastasia. I hope you'll find the website handy. I've only just found that it's actually run by some Czech guys; proud to hear that! 🙂


  7. Pingback: #200 | How I see it now

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s